FAQ: Explicitly point fingers at ASUS

.. as an example of a company that has been reported
to force malware based on Privoxy upon its customers.

diff --git a/doc/source/faq.sgml b/doc/source/faq.sgml
index b503d5c..8cc8b12 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/source/faq.sgml
+++ b/doc/source/faq.sgml
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
                 This file belongs into
                 ijbswa.sourceforge.net:/home/groups/i/ij/ijbswa/htdocs/
 
- $Id: faq.sgml,v 2.107 2014/12/19 12:31:46 fabiankeil Exp $
+ $Id: faq.sgml,v 2.108 2015/08/12 10:38:45 fabiankeil Exp $
 
  Copyright (C) 2001-2014 Privoxy Developers http://www.privoxy.org/
  See LICENSE.
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@
  </subscript>
 </pubdate>
 
-<pubdate>$Id: faq.sgml,v 2.107 2014/12/19 12:31:46 fabiankeil Exp $</pubdate>
+<pubdate>$Id: faq.sgml,v 2.108 2015/08/12 10:38:45 fabiankeil Exp $</pubdate>
 
 <!--
 
@@ -2233,11 +2233,11 @@ and related issues?</title>
 </para>
 <para>
  Lately there have been reports of problems with some kind of
- Privoxy versions that come preinstalled on some Netbooks.
- Some of the problems described are inconsistent with the behaviour
- of official Privoxy versions, which suggests that the preinstalled
- software may contain vendor modifications that we don't know about
- and thus can't debug.
+ "parental control" software based on Privoxy that came preinstalled on
+ certain <ulink url="http://sourceforge.net/p/ijbswa/bugs/813/">ASUS Netbooks</ulink>.
+ The problems described are inconsistent with the behaviour of official
+ Privoxy versions, which suggests that the preinstalled software may
+ contain vendor modifications that we don't know about and thus can't debug.
 </para>
 <para>
  Privoxy's <link linkend="copyright">license</link> allows vendor