Be more explicit about accept-intercepted-requests's lack of MITM support

[privoxy.git] / TODO

diff --git a/TODO b/TODO
index 5b259e5..0aee22d 100644 (file)
--- a/TODO
+++ b/TODO
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-$Id: TODO,v 1.90 2014/01/31 12:47:15 fabiankeil Exp $
+$Id: TODO,v 1.94 2014/02/02 12:03:50 fabiankeil Exp $
 
 Some Privoxy-related tasks, sorted by the time they
 have been added, not by priority.
@@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ http://ijbswa.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/ijbswa/current/TODO
     and redirect requests for them to Privoxy.
 
 86) Add a server-body-tagger action. This is trivial as as all the
-    functionallity required to do it already exists.
+    functionality required to do it already exists.
 
 87) Add a client-body-tagger action. This is less trivial as we currently
     don't buffer client bodies. After 14) is implemented it would be
@@ -331,3 +331,13 @@ http://ijbswa.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/ijbswa/current/TODO
      https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=959100
 
 117) Dynamic variables are documented poorly.
+
+118) There should be "escaped" dynamic variables that are guaranteed
+     not to break filters.
+
+119) Evaluate using pcre's jit mode.
+
+120) Add an option to limit pcre's recursion limit below the default.
+     On some platforms the recursion limit doesn't prevent pcre from
+     running out of stack space, causing the kernel to kill Privoxy
+     ungracefully.